ANSWERS: 48
  • As much as i dislike Bush, my partner said something that made me think - he does not act alone, the entire government & their advisors & financiers should all go. It is a rotten team, Bush is just the figurehead.
  • NO, a second chance would not hurt.
  • If Clinton can be impeached for lying about a blow job, surely Bush should be impeached for violating the Constitution he swore to uphold. (Warrantless wiretaps come to mind.)
  • all i can say is ..he needs a good trimming.
  • Yes! Impeach Bush! (There is some sh*t we wont eat).
  • NO, the only way this could get worse...President Cheney, don't get me wrong, I can't stand Bush, but President Cheney? I think I feel sick.
  • At this point it would a huge waste of time and money. He'll be out of office in less than a year.
  • The only bush I trust is my own.
  • No. Even if he needed it, he'd hit his term limit by the time the hearings ever got out of the red tape. If you want him gone, just invoke the Executive Orders and legislation that allows anybody anywhere to be detained indefinitely without even being charged. Declare him, Cheney, and their cronies enemy combatants. Problem solved!
  • I wish, but I rather doubt it will happen. I think the rest of his term, the New Dems will make him a Lame Duck President in many ways. But he has A WHOLE LOTTA NOT RIGHT to answer for. As do those who have served with him as "yes boss" supporters. I don't believe that ANY President aims to look a fool, or make hash of the office and position, but They are supposed to serve THE PEOPLE not support their own agendas!
  • Yes sure I will.I don't like the way he approached with Iraq and many other times I didnot like the way his govt.was functioning.
  • No, I would not, but only because that would leave Cheney as president.
  • Yes. In leading our country, he has been completely negligent. His presidency was pretty much to continue and finish what his father was unable to, not deal with matters that have come up presently.
  • To even suggest starting impeachment proceedings a few months before an election in which he can't run again is sheer stupidity. Your time would be better spent supporting your choice for the next election. Edit: Rate me down if you wish. And by doing it without comment, I get a good feeling for the kind of person you truly are, but I stand by my answer.
  • To late for that
  • He is out of office very soon, can we all just learn to live with the loser for a few more months?
  • Too late, he should have never been elected. Truthfully, I think the vote must have been rigged and bought. Especially in the second election. I cannot belive that that many Americans are that stupid!
  • This would just be waste of money....he's out soon. Let us all make a better choice next time.
  • No, if it's going to get done, then the American voting public should do it.
  • They should and have the legal right to do so.
  • some-body needs to. if it could be put to a binding, public vote, he wouldn't last long.
  • There is no basis for impeaching Bush. There is a basis for the Democrats acknowledging that Bush has lost the confidence of the country, that his appointments are based not on merit but on political congruence, that his decisions on Iraq have been consistently flawed, that his foreign policy has left America with an enormous black eye, that his domestic policy is non-existent, that his presidency is absolutely empty of significant accomplishments and instead is filled with empty prommises and inept strategies. But, unfortunately, the Dems are pussyfooting around and afraid to attack Bush as they should. The Democrats are the cowards here...and Bush continues to skate.
  • Even tho i go against ALL other answers on the page no i wouldnt, he's trying. And you shouldnt be impeached for trying.
  • No I wudnt cuz therez no reason 2.
  • Yes, I would. He's a horrid president, though I admit I don't want Cheney either...
  • Yes.... a thousand times YES!!!
  • Not only impeached, but removed from office as well...and no, they are not the same thing.
  • No, he should not. Even though he is really not fit for the job, has made an embarrassment out of his country to the entire world, and hires probably some of the worst speech writers in history, he hasn't done anything criminal while in office. And I am not fond of George Bush at all.
  • ........when did I miss out on this great fortune? I go in favor.
  • I am pro-impeachment, but as Nancy Pelosi noted, that ain't happening!
  • oppose.
  • I favor
  • Perhaps, but to late now.
  • Too late for that to happen. Though one might always hope for a plane crash?
  • No one got guts to impeached George Bush.
  • Yes. For perjury and war crimes. My 2 cents.
  • Yes, he should.
  • NO! He has handled every situation better than any of the other candidates in the past and present.
  • At this point in time it would be a pretty stupid waste of the taxpayers money, the Senators and congressmen & women's time and a excerise in futility. The people voting for it would be the same people who voted for the war!!! Let's get real and realize that this is all politics and anyone in office would have done the same thing. If you want, blame the people who advised him. He didn't come up with the findings by himself!!!
  • yes, but it's a bit late now. it still ought to go through just to prove to all the blind supporters just how crooked he and his administration really is.
  • Yes he should.
  • Yes both President Bush and VP Chaney should be impeached according to the reasons stated in the enclosed link. The situation in Georgia is a very difficult matter and if mishandled things a going to be pretty bad to say the least. http://www.wikihow.com/Take-Action-to-Impeach-a-US-President http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0308-33.htm http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,879270,00.html http://www.groundsforimpeachment.com/news/20080708kucnewarts.htm Please read the enclosed documents. Regards.
  • Yes, he and Cheney should and can both be impeached. Simultaneously. Now.
  • Yes he should.
  • Bush and Cheney are clearly guilty of numerous impeachable offenses. They have repeatedly violated the Constitution. They have transgressed national and international laws. They have lied to the American people time after time. Their conduct and their barbaric policies have reduced our country to a historic low in the eyes of people around the world. These are truly "high crimes and misdemeanors. to use the constitutional standard. From the beginning, the Bush-Cheney team's assumption of power was the product of questionable elections that probably should have been officially challenged -- perhaps even by a congressional investigation. In a more fundamental sense, American democracy has been derailed throughout the Bush-Cheney regime. The dominant commitment of the administration has been a murderous, illegal, nonsensical war against Iraq. That irresponsible venture has killed almost 4,000 Americans, left many times that number mentally or physically crippled, claimed the lives of an estimated 600,000 Iraqis (according to a careful October 2006 study from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) and laid waste their country. The financial cost to the United States is now $250 million a day and is expected to exceed a total of $1 trillion, most of which we have borrowed from the Chinese and others as our national debt has now climbed above $9 trillion -- by far the highest in our national history. All of this has been done without the declaration of war from Congress that the Constitution clearly requires, in defiance of the U.N. Charter and in violation of international law. This reckless disregard for life and property, as well as constitutional law, has been accompanied by the abuse of prisoners, including systematic torture, in direct violation of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
  • Id say more like tried at the Hague for War Crimes and Crimes against humanity.

Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy