Why shouldn't it?

It goes against religion. Christianity and other relgions. Its a theory, not a whole based fact the world will accept.

Because it gives kids a bit of a choice on what they would like to believe. I also think theology should be taught at a younger age.

It should not be taught as fact, it should be taught that some religions believe it to be fact, but it should not be taught as fact. Creationism has no scientific evidence backing it up, and is nothing more than a religious belief, and unless I am mistaken, the United States has a seperation of church and state. Schools are supposed to teach the facts as they are generally accepted by science, not as they are accepted by religion. The farthest the public school system can legally go in that direction is teaching that some religions believe that, they should not teach it as fact. Private schools that reciev no government grants or support may teach it if they choose to, but any academic establishment funded by the government should not, and constitutionally cannot, teach creationism.

It should not be taught in scools, at least in any science class because it is not in fact science. I would have no problem with it being taught in a Religion or a Mythology class. It is once again a matter of context and the way in which it is presented. Creationism is as much of a myth as the Earth being flat and at the center of the Universe.

It was taught in my school right along with the theory of Evolution. If we start to get to the point where we think we know everything and only teach that one thing then that is the end to true learning. I don't think we should be limiting the things we expose our children to but increasing them; even if only to compare and contrast differences in points of view.

Just to broaden the spectrum of things kids learn. The more info they get, the better. They should see as many perspectives as they can.

Regardless of the origins of humanity, teaching the Theory of Evolution will educate the young about the divide between science and religion. This is an important part of the scientific method; having to prove and defend your findings against adversity. If you believe that this is not an important thing to teach in schools, then you are not seeking education of our young; you are merely programming them to be mindless drones.

It SHOULD NOT be taught in the public school system. At least not as an alternative theory to evolution. It is not a theory, offers no factual evidence nor can it. Creationism is simply a belief of the Christian and other mono-theistic religious communities. It can be covered/discussed in a classroom such as 'world religions' along with the belief systems of other major religions. I say 'major' because there are hundreds of religions in existence. The 'minor' ones would probably get better exposure in a separate classroom. Teaching ABOUT the world's religions should be in the public curriculum, because of the pure historical value. Understanding the various belief systems serves to educate and inform, and this knowledge can go a long way to mitigate our present current events. I think it is of the utmost arrogance for 'born-agains' and other intolerant "christians" to claim that they are the only ones going to 'heaven', that all other 'non-believers' will 'go to hell'. What a bunch of crap. By the way, all of you born-agains' or 'jesus freaks' - if you're not a Jehova's Witness - you ain't going to heaven - Jehovas believe they are the only Christians truly worthy of the of path to glory. Now, based on your belief system, how can you debate that? Here you thought you were gonna be with the man, but now you find out you're in the wrong line. OOPS! How can you dismiss the Eaastern Philosophies such as Buhddism Hinduism or Daoism? (excuse my poor spelling). Their beliefs are more rooted in the harmony and relationships between self and 'nature' (for lack of a better word - I just can't accurately describe it). Those beliefs actually make a lot more sense to me. And gee, I can't recall any history of Buhddists going on Crusades to kill heathens who don't believe what they do. I can't recall these Easterners wiping out (nearly) an entire race of humans. Think Hawaii. The missionaries, in their zeal, brought disease, death and corruption to arguably the most peaceful (yeah, they had tribal battles, but it was not a way of life), beautiful, blessed race on the planet. I still can't reconcile that. And it continues with indigeneous natives in the Amazon. Gotta bring god to them - gotta save them - gotta rescue them from their heathen ways! Jesus would be so disgusted.

I think that it should at least be taught as an alternative to Darwin's theory of evolution. It should at least be presented to students that a Higher Power created the Universe and life and evidence that there is for a young Earth should also be presented just as evidence for an old Earth is presented. I hope that this is helpful. -In the Master's service. Thank you and God bless you!

it shouldn't be taught in school because it's ridiculous

Everything should be taught in schools. To do any less would be born of a desire to control or manipulate.

i think it should be taught when the children are a little older around 16/17, along with the theory of evolution, that way they an make up their own minds about it.

Either both Evolution and Creation should be discussed (not taught) or neither one should be discussed. Evolution is no more fact than Creation. "Theory of Evolution" means just that. It's a THEORY.

no, because there is no factual basis for the validity of creationism. No support to base it's truth upon

Which version? Christian? Ancient Egyptian? Church Of The Flying Spaghetti Monster? Just to be on the safe side we'd better include EVERY creation myth.

If we want to educate our children, we should tell them what human science has found out. For this reason, they should not be taught Creationism as the theory explaining the history of times past. However, when explaining modern scientific views, there could also be a short reviews about what people believed before those views became mainstream science. For instance Flat Earth, Geocentrism, etc. And it could also be mentioned that some sects still maintain a belief in those old ideas. And give some reasons to explain why they do this. But there should certainly not be a long, time consuming presentation of those ideas.

It is a valid theory.

It shouldn't be- religion should not be taught by public schools. I say this as a conservative Christian, too! On the other hand, when evolution is taught, it should be taught with an opening- basically, the teacher should also make it clear that certain people don't believe in that, and the teacher should not denigrate that position. When teaching evolution, as with anything, the teacher should also teach weak spots in it. But creationism as such should not be taught!

I dont think it should, it has too many holes in it's theory, even more so than evolution

As a christian mom, knowing the laws under seperation of church, I do not believe that creation should be taught in school. Even in different religions there are conflicting theories. If you want your children to learn about God, it needs to be taught at home. However I don't think Darwin's Theory should be taught either. Until there are proven facts in any theroy I believe it should be left alone.

I am totally against it, as it defies known scientific evidence. However, if creationism is taught in schools, it seems only fair that every religions creation should be taught in schools then since of course the United States is not a Christian country. Our country was founded on freedom of speech and religious oppression, or have people forgotten this?

hmmmm... I give up. There is no need of fighting, maybe your ancesters are monkeys. I don't know I wan't there.

Why? Easy. You start with that, next you go back to the earth-centric universe. Then the whole idea of the earth being flat has a great comeback. And in a few generations the entire US research and science system will run out of personnel because science just isn't "in" anymore. Many countries will be happy to fill that gap and getting the associated industry.

I'm not averse to teaching Creationsim in school, so long as it's not taught as an alternative to evolution but rather as an example of creation myths and cultural development, right alongside other creation myths. It might have a place in comparable theology or even philosophy, but not in science.

No one knows, nor will ever KNOW (for sure) how we all got here. No matter what one person believes happened or Who could be responsible for putting us here, there are many ways such a being could have chosen to put us here. I DON'T think we should TELL impressionable children ANY theory about how or why we're all here before they are even old enough to make up their own minds or have an opinion or belief of their own. But it makes no difference at all what I or anyone else thinks, because it is the way it is in the schooling system, and this is why there are a variety of private or parochial schooling options for concerned parents.

Why shouldn't it?

Should it? There seems to be efficacy in exploring a variety of concepts that consider the idea that humans may be part of something larger. The efficacy may simply be about broadening our thinking.... Depending on the interpretation, considerable implied peculiarities can sprout from any theory (like creationism)....and some of those apparent germinations may appear logical on the surface but may, in fact, be quite insane...; simply ask yourself how you feel sitting within any idea....constrained, secure, happy...etc... But, why not teach other philosophies such as pantheism, ayurveda, objectivism....; while each of these may not per se discuss the apparently broader question of how we got here, they do propose a variety of seemingly useful paradigms within which we may consider where we seem to be...

Because evoloution is being taught in schools, and creation is also a theory that has just as much merrit.

We Flat Earthers believe that creation is THE only answer. After all, we live on a pizza base

The short answer is: it shouldn't, outside of a Comparative Religions class.

Comic relief?

It shouldnt be. No creationism, no intelligent design, nothing to do with the Bible other than history/culture references in history class. Science belongs in science class, religion does not. In the interest of fairness, the principles of every religion would have to be taught if Christianity were, and that is unrealistic, would cause tremendous uproar, and is NOT what public school is for. If parents want their children taught about the Bible and creationism, they can send their kids to church and church school or a private religiously affiliated school, NOT public school.

Creationism should be taught in church and home...where it will be taught properly. I have no confidence that, in public schools, such would even come close to becoming achieved to my satisfaction. I could see my kid comin' home from our school and telling me what he "learned" in Creation Class today...and blowing my top! No, I'll pass on that! Hell, there are any number of churches I wouldn't let him "learn" from...but at least I have multiple choice to select from! Insofar as public schools, it's hard enough just getting kids to be adequately educated in the 3 R's, for cryin' out loud!

No idea - except as a curious adjunct to a comparative religions class...

I think both Evolution and Creationism should be available but neither should be forced upon the students. In this area of science/pseudo science, it should be a matter of choice for the kids not a matter of what the teachers or school board feel it necessary to force-feed into the curriculum. Contrary to popular belief of many "adults", the children today are not stupid. They are quite capable of making a choice as to what they want to learn, especially in high school. When I was a student in high school, my science teacher taught both creation and evolution. There were no battles, threats of job termination, screams of dismay from atheistic parents or Christian parents. The parents, teachers, school board and students preferred that both evolution and creation both be taught and actually encouraged it. There was harmony and peace because all had a say in the matter and all agreed. Because there was harmony and peace, and all had a say in the matter, 99.9% of the students graduated, many with honors. Let the children have a choice in regards to creation and evolution.

As an important part of the Christian mythos, it should be taught ... in Comparative Religion class.

It shouldn't. It's a myth, make believe, fiction. And... as such... it's not all that good or interesting. There are much better myths and fictions to teach in literature class. +5

Considering so many people believe in such nonsense, it makes sense to offer it in a religion class. no way should it be taught as science, since it has absolutely no scientific backing.

It should be taught only as an example of what happens to your belief system if you quit going to school.

Of course!

Yes, along with all other religions. It's time we understand eachother.

IMHO, creationism and evolution should be taught side by side. I agree that we were created, but we have also evolved. If we hadn't, we'd still be throwing spears at mammoths.

It should be taught in the same way all religious beliefs are taught in schools. These are theories that people believe in. The end. When you are taught in science you are presented with these "theories" people have come up with (including Evolution) and the evidence they used to prove them. Then we do our scientific work based on the assumption that they are correct. That is how it should be taught and how it is taught in schools. Even if you don't personally believe it, for the purposes of this class you will assume it is true because that's what the exam board believes. You can't answer a question about Evolution in an exam with a Creationist answer that's not how it goes. For the record I am a firm believer in Evolution, but I don't have a problem with others believing what they want to.

It shouldn't. There is 0 scientific proof backing up creationism. It's a psuedo scientific explanation for how the world came to be based on fear by hysterical christians of having their faith invalidated. There is A TON of evidence backing up darwinian evolution, though.

Well how do you find refernces for your term papaer besides the bible which, by the way is not veifiable. I guess you take it on faith and everyone gets an A.

Just an s an example of (1) a failed theory (actually superstitious speculative assertion) believed by millions at one time, (2) the extent of stupidity of ignorance.

because the human genome team believes it and evolution is a theory with some large holes in it.

Certainly! It's more scientific than the ever-changing guesses of those that believe in evolution. The category should be under the catagory of Science and not religion.

Being that the Bible shaped so much of Western civilization, it should. It should be in the curriculum, but only cursory glance, not studied in depth. Maybe you can come up w/ what subject it should be under. Maybe under an English literature class instead of a scientific class. Nothing censored. Idk if the maturity is high enough at that age to process it. Advise?

it should be taught as a belif with ALL the facts and prof. but people make the choice