There is much evidence to prove that evolution is real.All physics and other scientific evidence proves that evolution is a fact.Carbon dating is one of the ways that evolution is proven.The earth is billions of years old and all that exists started from the simple form of life,like the single celled animals..

evolution is real, religion is what we make it.

I say. Where's the missing link?

Evolution is a theory, so it can not be proven. I do not believe it. I do not find any "evidence" that sways me to believe it, either.

Isn't it called "the theory of evolution?" I'm just sayin.

I say that we have too much to learn yet to say that we have all this proof. I don't say that I don't believe in it just that a lot of what we think of as proof now might be ludicrous to those who study it 50 years from now. As far as religion goes, it is just as easy to believe that God just spoke the world into existence as it is to believe in the proof of evolution. He could just as easily created the world and then set things in motion that today we consider evidence that evolution exists. If you believe in the same God that I do then all things are possible with Him. And by the way, if He did create the world and set things in motion like I said before then we wouldn't be able to prove it either way so your proof would be relative.

my belief is that both Creationism as well as the theory of evolution are BOTH REAL... think about it this way something has to be CREATED for it to be evolutionized. So in my opinion both beiefs are real in one way or the other

It works, enough said apart from, one day we will all loos are elbows due to excessive phone use ....... MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM think about it!

Evolution can work with religion. Evolution has happened and will continue.

There is a great article by the editor of Scientific American that responds to typical attacks on the theory of evolution by creationists. Check it out 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense - John Rennie http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000D4FEC-7D5B-1D07-8E49809EC588EEDF

Does the question refer to Macro or Micro evolution? Macro meaning evolving from one species to another (i.e Apes -> Humans) Micro meaning evolving from withing a species (i.e. Moths wings darkening, birds losing their wings, snakes losing their rattles, etc.) We can demonstrate that Micro evolution occurs a lot but I have yet to read about or hear about evidence of Macro evolution.

Ther's no solid proof for either creationism or evolutionism. At least not to a level where we can say that everything evolved intelligently by means of luck. The Alien equeson is worth looking into. Look at the large gaps between each stage with no in between evidence.

They've got Charles Darwin trapped out on highway 5

I sort of believe in evolution but there's plenty of it that doesn't make sense. For example, they think eukaryotes evolved from prokaryotes but eukaryotes have a gene for a protein that NO prokaryotes have. To explain this, evolutionary theorists say there must have been a fourth domain that donated it's genetic material and then went extinct. Basically they had no answer so they made up non-existent creatures. THAT is kinda dumb...

There is no evidence that proves it, at least, not as a whole, anyway. -In the Service of King Jesus. Thank you and God bless you!

I believe in both creation and evolution..one does not exclude the other.

what do you have to say about darwin himself ..who repented b4 death (the darwin theory?)

science has proven evolution. creation theory is not scientifically proven therefore making it less credible. i think its pretty scary that in some schools they teach creation theory as a scientific fact. i think that the american children already have a totally difficult and absurd world to deal with without being completely brainwashed.

Why do you have to be a creationist, to not agree with the theory of evolution..? If you want to find an opposition, look in the scientific community itself, not religion. Areas:anthropology,geology,psychology,anatomy,physics, chemistry,sociology...etc The theory like the premisses, mutates to freely..., so much so that it now resembles theories it once stood in opposition of.

evolution is not real! what you really believe we came from monkeys? how come monkeys aren't still evolving? that in and of itself proves evolution a lie

Sorry if I rant a little this is basically a simple reason why Evolution is not even possible. 1)Nothing plus Nothing Equals Nothing then why is there something? For something to exist it needs a Cause if there is no Creator (fist cause) then there should be no Creation, and because there is a Creation logical there should also be a Creator? sounds logical right? Then the question goes? Where did ‘God” came from? the Atheist (“trump card..”) There can not be a infinite number of regresses of Causes for a Effect, so logical there must be a Uncaused Cause, Time, space, matter Had a Cause well if this Cause made this effect (TIME) Then logical this Cause would not be held to the laws of time of needing a Cause or aging etc. You get my point. Basically this would mean that "God" Would not need a Cause because he or "the Un-Caused Cause" created time and existed before time it self. follow me? so if this un-Caused Cause Created the world what’s to say he could not speak into existence Man, animals, water, and oxygen? 2) Second “Simple” argument Intelligence can only come from a Intelligent Creator, for a Intelligent being to exist it would need a Intelligent Uncaused being maker? 3) Laws, The laws that Govern time, space, and the world have no Reason to work they way they do there is no logical reason that this laws exist, and all laws logically need a Law Giver right? 4)Fine tuning is a good argument against Naturalistic explanations .The odds against pretty much everything Evolutionist origin’s of life coming from nothing, and then being organized and then evenly spaced ,not to far not to close for life to exist, not to mention the number of lucky planet arrangements, if this planet was not here we would be bombarded by meteors, of if this planet was not here or off by a inch our seasons would be changing every 9 hours , if the sun was to close we burn to far we freeze if even off by a couple inches .Someone already mentioned the odds of protein coming together on its own.. It was a hell of a lot of Zero’s. p/s the Miller experiment can not be used to support evolution because first it was the wrong mixture of gases used to what the Earths condition’s are ,thought to have been . It also does not explain how nothing plus nothing became everything… my 2 cent’s Personally as a Ex. Atheist I have personal experience with this all powerful uncaused Cause Which id love to share with you sometime my email is anglewiingsiam555@hotmail.com This un-caused Creator has interacted with mankind and has given his word to us and it says if you seek him sincerely you will find him. Lose the pride and lose the doubt its useless faith won't kill you and the worst that can happen is you find God and become a born again Jesus freak which is not as bad as I thought it would be ha... but anyways ,sorry for all my typos and thanks for putting up with me, I’m not perfect so please forgive me - Sincerely Rudy

scientists say that humans came from apes.. am i right? yet there are still apes and monkeys around.. well God made humans and creatures in his image, so humans and apes WOULD look alike... and i do agree that alot of evolutionary evidence does make sense.. but i cannot dismiss both evidences there are...

I belive in Evolution. I don't know all the details, so I'm not the person you want to be debating this with, but I certainly don't believe in god. *This is not an opportunity for preaching or bible humping. Good day.*

EDIT: Eh... excuse my Kent Hovind influenced self. It took a lil bit to figure out that what he says ain't exactly all true either. Where I still stand against evolution, I would like to apologize for my past ignorance. To answer the question now... actually, I wouldn't answer this question these days. It's too broad of a question and shows that the questioner has already made up their mind. There's nothing specific that I could really address, so I wouldn't really waste my time quite frankly.

I don't NOT not believe in it...but once bitten twice shy, I also think of Piltdown man....

Evidence has to be interpreted, and most of the evidence can be interpreted two ways. A smoking gun by a dead body may mean murder, may mean suicide, or may mean phony evidence planted by someone. I've kept up with this debate for forty years and what amazes me is that an honest person could believe in either one and should have some doubts about whichever one he believes in. If creation is the way it happened, for example, apparently God wanted to leave open the option of not believing in it, which is pretty much what the Bible says--"Surely Thou art a God who hidest Thyself, O Lord." In other words, even God doesn't try to shove the truth down our throats, so the debate should go on.

I have a lot to say about it. I alread know I'm going to get a lot of negative points for answering this question in this way but oh well. The evdence that supports evolution is weak, and its not really evidence at all. Evolution has poor and untrusting dating methods for fossils and other objects that they try to guess the age of. Not only that but evolution goes against a lot of Laws in science and contradicts basic science axioms. And I dont know if you guys noticed...but evolution is still(and always will be) considered a "theory", something that has not been proven. Thanks for letting me post my answer and if you want me to back up this then go ahead and email me(souldierofchrist777@yahoo.com), take care and God bless.

look at this

Do you believe in gravitation? Do you believe in relativity theory? Do you believe in chaos theory? Don't ask stupid questions. Beliefs do not play any role in Science. Do you know about a scientific theory? If so, then you accept or reject it, provided you have better arguments based on facts, demonstrations and a superior logic. If not, then be honest and say "I don't know". Evolution is one of the Major Theories in Biology along with Cell Theory and Genetics. It seems that you don't understand what the word "theory" means. Then, for beginners you can start with Wikipedia's entrance: "In science, a theory is a mathematical or logical explanation, or a testable model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise verified through empirical observation. It follows from this that for scientists "theory" and "fact" do not stand in opposition."

It hasn't been proven. You can't do an experiment to duplicate it. It is "junk science." It's more of a faith than science.

A theory has to provide both predictive and retrodictive explanation. Darwin theory has no predictive end result, so does not fulfill the criteria of scientific theory as established by Newton and Bacon...this theory is more of a historical explanation. These are some of the areas of evolutionary theory that generate heated debate, between adherents and opponents...Evolutionary psychology, Sociobiology, Social Darwinism, Species and Taxonomy, catastrophism and uniformitarianism, Comparative anatomy. A philosophical debate regarding ethics and moral intentionality, reveals the ability Darwin theory has for providing answers that are effective but not convincing, especially regarding Altruism

I don't believe it.

I believe in it only in a limited way. I say "a lot of hot air" - people tend to find only what they are looking for and what they are looking for is self-centered. Which is why I believe in God.

01-02-2017 We have this prophecy we call Armageddon. The USA is prominently absent from the story. The nation must collapse and be made helpless. This evolution argument is nothing more than a distraction while the nation and the world grind on toward the final scene.