WTF are you on about? What Newtonian Principles? Like the Theory of Universal Gravitation or the Theory of Kinematics? You realize that those are scientific theories, right? Holes in what theory? Evolution? I recommend you look up a few definitions before you go preaching to people about these topics. I'd be willing to bet that "evolution" doesn't mean what you think it means.

Izanami and Izanagi were the creators. 99.54% of my people in Japan do not think God exists.

Evolution is a fact of science. Children know too little to object to it.

Hi Reisan, I saw your comment above and was motivated to ask Google if Evolution was a fact. I was surprised to see the article pop up from National Center for Science Education. Titled: Evolution: Fact and Theory; It stated that "It is an incontrovertible fact that organisms have changed, or evolved, during the history of life on Earth" It went on to talk about "Patterns in Nature" Mechanisms of Evolution", then ended with Evidence for Evolution, and its significance in our lives: all in all it is a compelling article that basically said animals/humans have been able to adapt to their environment. Which anyone with an open mind would agree with. But the article made this statement, "While progress has been made in this area, the origin of life remains an interesting, but unanswered, question. Again anyone with an open mind would agree with this statement as well. Both Evolution and the Bible have a starting point, Stephen Hawking also alluded this. The Bible in Genesis 1:1 says "In the beginning" NWT What I'm getting to is that both sides agree to a "Big Bang" if you will, But then for me, could everything just be one accident after another. I hope you don't mind, I left you the link to The Origin of Life?—Five Questions Worth Asking. https://www.jw.org/finder?srcid=jwlshare&wtlocale=E&prefer=lang&docid=1102010349 I hope you find it interesting.

Good point. Science is willing to adapt itself based on what we learn by researching it. However, I don't think the people who made that site understand what "evolution" is, nor does it seem that they care to know. I could save them all of the trouble, no $10 M necessary - just look up the word in the dictionary and see that the name of the contest has nothing to do with the proof that they are demanding. It's like if I said I'd pay ten million if anyone could prove that the sky is blue, and then defined the contest so that people actually had to prove that we never landed on the moon. Evolution, in case anyone somehow doesn't know this by now, is the process by which gradual changed between different generations of progeny develop different traits than their distant ancestors. The key ideas are 1. that there is development of new traits, and 2. that this development is gradual over the course of many generations. Where is abiogenesis attached at all to this term? It's just purely willful ignorance, coupled with an incredible amount of arrogance, and that's all. Whoever made that site could be 100% proven wrong with whatever they are trying to defend tomorrow, and they'd still refuse to pay.

I guess I'm an idiot for thinking that the supposed evolution of chemicals into life has anything to do with evolution. Call it abiogenesis or whatever you like it still amounts to spontaneous generation. Do not confuse natural selection (or selective breeding in husbandry) with evolution. You can breed for certain traits and breed out certain traits but the information is already there

Very good. As for evolution itself, we've observed it in real time, first with microorganisms and even with squirrels in the Pacific Northwest USA/Canada. It certainly doesn't mean that all species originated from other species. There are things like crocodiles, which haven't evolved any substantial amount for probably an extremely long time. However, I see no reason whatsoever, that the fact that evolution happens and seems to continue to happen provides any evidence as to whether or not life on Earth started with a blob of goo floating in the ocean. Science itself has very little to say about the ultimate originate of all life on Earth. Maybe someday, scientists in a lab will be able to make a blob of goo come to life in an aquarium or something, and that itself would certainly not disprove the existence of God. Likewise, though, the fact that science does not have an answer for this does not prove the existence of God. Belief in God ultimately comes down to faith - nothing more / nothing less. Trying to prove or disprove God based on the rules of logical debate is only ever going to be 100% futile.

Yes, biological evolution has been observed in nature and in the laboratory...but all that the theory of evolution proposes has NOT been observed. The origin of life is tangential to the theory of evolution. (That theory does NOT address that subject.) But there are real scientific theories concerning that. It's not true that "science has little to say" about that. *** I would not agree that applying logic in an attempt to prove the existence of God is necessarily futile. Consider Descartes' "A Discourse on the Method", for example.