Thanks for the reminder. It did sound familliar, and now I remember it. The verse in Leviticus you are referring to was directed specifically at the newly formed nation of Isreal. The verse speaks of mixing two different breeds of animals, two different seed types, and two different thread types in their clothing. These were all forbidden only to the Isrealites. It was symbolic of their purity of worship. Just as they were not allowed to mix these things, they were not allowed to mix pure worship with worship of false gods. They were to maintain purity in all things. These were simply symbols. They did not mix animal or plant breeds, thread types, or forms of worship. A constant reminder of who they were. It is true that Deuteronomy 22:11 specifies the prohibition of wearing clothing made of linen and wool woven together, however it is unlikely that this had anything to do with Pagan practices, but more likely because the interweaving of linen and wool was used in fabrics used to construct the tabernacle itself as well as in the manufatcure of the priests graments. Exodus 26:1 specifies that both types of spun tread were to be used for the tent cloths of the tabernacle. Linen is actually a thread spun from flax, not cotton. In reference to this, the Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem, 1973, Vol. 14, col. 1213) says: “The clothing of the priests was notably exempt from the prohibition of sha´atnez [a garment of two sorts of thread, NW]. Exodus 28:6, 8, 15 and 39:29 prescribe that various pieces be made of linen and colored wool interwoven. . . . This suggests that the general prohibition was grounded on the taboo character of such a mixture, pertaining exclusively to the realm of the sacred.” So it appears that the specific prohibition of mixing these two fabrics was only for the general public if Israel, and the priestly class was exempt from it. While researching this, I found one scripture which would seem to contradict this law, but is easily explained. At Proverbs 31:22 as Solomon describes a "capable wife", he says, "Coverlets she has made for herself. Her clothing is of linen and wool dyed reddish purple". It may seem at frist glance that this is a contradiction, but it should be noted that Solomon says only that she has clothing made of both materials, not that whe interweaves them. Thanks for asking the question! It's good to have the memory refreshed.

It is not literally about clothing. It is about NOT mixing with other people who do not share a person's love of God. In the Old Testament, Jews were to marry ONLY Jews. Jesus changed this from a racial setup to a belief setup(1 Corinthians 7:39) A wife is bound during all the time her husband is alive. But if her husband should fall asleep [in death], she is free to be married to whom she wants, only in [the] Lord.

The whole thing, from Chabbad: http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=381831 Of all the ancient laws and customs of the Jews, one of the most mysterious is that of the law forbidding Shatnez. Most Jews probably have never heard of it. Some may have heard of it but do not know what it is. Even those who may be scrupulous in following the Kosher dietary laws, may not concern themselves with Shatnez. The reality is that both are of equal standing in the Torah's 613 commandments. What is Shatnez? Shatnez is the biblical prohibition against wearing wool and linen together in the same garment. (Wearing one piece of clothing that is linen and another that is wool at the same time is permitted.) This prohibition against Shatnez is found in Deuteronomy 22:11 and Leviticus 19:19. A combination of any other materials do not create Shatnez. The reference to wool refers to wool from sheep or lamb. It does not refer to camel wool, mohair, angora, cashmere, alpaca or vicuna. The bibical reference to linen applies only to fibers from the flax plant, not hemp or jute. However, reprocessed fibers may also contain Shatnez. The modern American Jew who is even remotely interested in Shatnez may well dismiss the problem by pointing out that the label on clothing specifically describes the fabrics used in any garment. Not so, according to the experts, even if the label says that the garment is 100% wool. Invariably the label only describes the shell of the garment, and ignores padding and ornamental threads. Wool that has a linen thread sewn through it is forbidden, just as thread that is a mixture of linen and wool is forbidden. According to experts in the field, this is more likely to occur in European clothing than in clothing made in the United States or Canada. The prohibition also includes any combination of wool and linen regardless of whether the two are combined in one cloth or are separate pieces of cloth within the same garment. Even suits that are 100% synthetic may contain Shatnez. American law allows some leeway in labeling. A label that states that a garment is 100% wool may contain as much as 2% of other materials. In addition, the label refers to the fabric, not any threads or material behind the lining. The prohibition applies not only to suits, coats, dresses and pants but to any type of clothing including socks, pajamas, gloves and ties. The prohibition is so strict that it is even forbidden to try on an article of clothing that contains Shatnez. It is also forbidden to wear a garment in which an ornamental part such as a tassel that does not touch the body has Shatnez. However. it is permitted to try on a garment in a clothing store without knowing whether it has Shatnez or not. If the label clearly states that the garment includes both wool and linen, then it is prohibited. Why Such A Law? The law prohibiting Shatnez falls into the category of what is known as a Chok, a law that cannot be explained. Various reasons have been suggested however. The explanation given by Maimonides is that pagan priests were required to wear garments made of wool and linen. The prohibition may have been established to separate Jews from pagan practices. It is interesting to note however, that the clothing of the priests in the Temple were exempt from the prohibition giving rise to an alternate explanation that the prohibition was designed to separate priestly from public practice. A second and more colorful explanation is that Cain brought wool as an offering, whereas Abel brought flax. The mixture was lethal and Abel lost his life. The Zohar from the Kabalah, the study of Jewish mysticism, says that wearing Shatnez causes an evil spirit to lurk within the wearer. A further explanation is that the Parochet, the curtain used in the Temple, and the garments worn by priests in the Temple were made from wool and linen. Therefore. Jews were forbidden to wear anything that was similar. A more esoteric explanation is that everything has its own spiritual force. By mixing certain items together, these forces are destroyed and cannot perform their assigned task. Regardless of the reason, the law remains "on the books " The Shatnez Checkers of Today From out of two verses in the Torah, and adding the complexities of modern clothing manufacturing, there has arisen an international service to test for Shatnez. Since clothing labels cannot be relied upon, for the Shatnez observant there must be a way in which to determine whether or not an article of clothing contains Shatnez. The answer is the Shatnez sample taker, and the Shatnez tester in the Shatnez laboratory. The sample takers are trained to take appropriate samples from a garment (without ruining the garment) and to send the samples to the Shatnez laboratory. At the laboratory. Shatnez testers examine the sample under a low powered (about 100X) microscope, either binocular or monocular, and are able to identify the ingredients. Laboratories exist in most major Jewish communities in North America. Most of the laboratories do not operate full time but have a reasonable short turnaround time of a few days. They also will receive and return garments by courier or regular mail. It is rare that a laboratory is not able to determine if a garment is Shatnez. There is no doubt that with the wide-spread use of synthetic fabrics, the issue of Shatnez is not as prominent as it once was for the traditionally observant. However, the issue still arises, especially since many garments are manufactured in various parts of the world and in some cases with parts of a garment being manufactured in one country and parts in another. The result is that, it is difficult for consumers to know everything that is in that garment. New fabrics are also being developed and new combinations of fabrics. Considering these developments. the Shatnez Testers of America and their contacts in other countries have an informal network by which alert notices are sent out as new developments are discovered. This is all part of a vibrant support system that has been developed around this ancient and mysterious prohibition. and see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shatnez