ANSWERS: 6
  • Possibly within my lifetime. The trick: someone who has a (relatively) sterling reputation needs to run. In other words: not Clinton.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thank you, for your comment
    • Army Veteran
      (coming soon)
  • Playing the "take turns" game is what has gotten us into this mess. We just had to see the first black president, and who did we get? A Communist. Then it was a woman's "turn" - who did they choose? Hillary - who studied politics under the tutorage of Saul Alinsky who (dare I say it?) was a Communist radical. When Hillary failed in her campaign fraud, it created such an inferno within the political stage that Trump was targeted for impeachment before he was sworn in. ¶ What kind of federal crime can a person commit before he is even sworn into office that would warrant impeachment (twice) and a never-ending witch hunt to fabricate whatever evidence the losers could find to stop him from running for a second term? ¶ You people are amazing. You're nothing but a buffalo stampede heading for a cliff.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for your comment :)
    • bostjan64
      Man, none of your claims make any sense. Do you need help? 1. Obama is communist? Based off of what? Because he wanted universal healthcare? That IS a socialist idea, just like a public police force or fire brigade. I guess your local sheriff is a pink commie too, then. 2. HRC is a communist? Why? Because she had a teacher who was communist? Then I got news for you, bro - anyone who studied with multiple teachers will have multiple conflicting political philosophies. 3. Trump was impeached for HRC's political campaign fraud. This is just nonsense and has no connection to reality, buddy. 4. Trump was impeached before he was sworn in. Pretty easy to look that up, but I assume you won't, so I'll just tell you that you are flat out wrong and we'll move on to 5. Trump's impeachment was a witch-hunt. Trump was impeached for withholding congressionally-approved funds to try to leverage political favours from a foreign power, which he did on a phone call with several witnesses. He was then impeached again for inciting a riot to try to overturn the election, and almost was found guilty the second time, even though it takes 2/3 of the senate to do so, meaning that his own party had turned on him at that point. So, I have no idea how you can substantiate your opinion with any sort of facts. So, who is following the narrative without any critical thought? It looks to be pretty clearly you. Look, I don't like HRC one bit, and I wasn't a fan of Obama's administration, but jumping from that to Trump is like leaving a house infested with roaches just to run into a burning building. Trump was an experiment - we tried it, the results were objectively awful - time to move on and try something else. If you don't want to believe simple easily-verified facts, then that's not everyone else's problem.
    • Army Veteran
      I never said Trump was impeached because of HRC's campaign fraud - you should have learned how to read before you left 1st grade. Trump was targeted for impeachment after he threw his hat into the ring (that would be ((( before ))) HRC's campaign fraud for those of you who passed reading AND comprehension. ¶ "Trump was impeached for withholding congressionally-approved funds to try and leverage political favors...which he did on a phone call with several witnesses." You must mean the "Quid Pro Quo" call that Biden bragged about doing in 2015. The transcript of the REAL "phone call" was made public after Adam Schiff stood in front of Congress and lied his ass off with his own version of the phone call - never expecting that Trump would release the actual call. ¶ I don't know what you hope to accomplish here, but we do enjoy listening to a good storyteller. If you know of one, send him this way. You're a storyteller, but not a very good one.
  • I don't know when, but chances are: a female's greater presence in positions like senatorships creates opportunities for women to rise up the ranks and become presidents.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for your comment :)
  • I don't think Americans want a female president. Most females voted against Hillary in 2016. If ever there was a chance to have a female in office it was then. She would have to be exceptional to overcome the sexism from both males and females.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for your comment :)
  • Depends on if the repubs impeach and remove the old geezer in chief or not. It may be sooner than you think. 1/12/23
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for your comment :)
  • Personally, I don't care one bit what the president's private anatomy looks like. I just want a leader who has strong leadership abilities and isn't a scammer or complete loony. But that doesn't appear to be in the cards for 2024 or any time in the reasonably near future.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for your comment :)
    • Army Veteran
      Everyone who says that they don't like Trump has all given the same reason as you (cue the crickets) - none. So tell me - what do YOU have against Trump other than his speech skills are unpolished? What did he do to warrant being targeted for impeachment before the election was even over? ¶ The FBI's top investigator Peter Strzok exchanged text messages to his lover (attorney): “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Page texted Strzok in August 2016. “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded.
    • Army Veteran
      Just dropping by to see f there were any responses. NOPE! As usual, no Liberal has a reason for hating Trump. I've asked this question many times of people who say "I don't like Trump" but then when challenged to explain why the only response is silence. They don't have a reason - they are told by the political leaders they support that Trump is bad, and so they naturally carry that ball forward to the next goal line. This is called "having others do your thinking for you". You should be ashamed to be so ignorant in politics (and other areas) - you open your mouth thinking that what you say makes you sound smart when it only shows how intellectually challenged you are.

Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy