ANSWERS: 5
  • I doubt he'd entertain the idea of starting WWIII out of the blue at 74 years old. And, evidently, Elizabeth II allowed Charles III to become the King, so, if she was ever that worried about it, they must have worked out some sort of understanding.
    • Hulk70166
      King Charles doesn't have the authority to invade America anymore. That went out with George III. Also England doesn't have the ability to invade America. They lack the manpower and materiel. Next there is no reason to invade America. We get along great and exchange information all the time. Next it would be disastrous for both sides to fight. Tourism would end, the royal family would be deposed and America would lose its eye on Europe. The whole thing is asinine. I felt sure somebody was going to point this out . Nobody did. It means a lot of you bought my line of bullshit. lol Oh, BTW Charles never told his mom about his dreams to conquer the US. I made it up. lol
  • No. Any decision to go to war or invade another country would be taken by the Prime Minister and parliament, not the Monarch. We are not going to invade our closest ally, a NATO member with has more nuclear weapons than us.
  • With King Biden at the helm? Where is your confidence all of a sudden?
    • Hulk70166
      Biden won in a fair election. The only proof you have that he didn't is homemade. Live with it. Imagine how we felt when you cheated on the 2016 election and Trump won. He even fooled 95% of the pundits and every single newspaper in the USA. Now how did that happen without corruption? lol
    • Army Veteran
      "Homemade proof"? ### Deny this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMInZYlQjrM
    • Hulk70166
      Yes. I checked that link. Everything he said he made up or was a bald faced lie.
    • Army Veteran
      What did you do, stop the video 2 minutes into it? What exactly did he "make up"? Your own party corroborated everything he said. Are they liars too? Or are you just in denial as usual? "Sometimes, opening your eyes may be the most painful thing you ever have to do." - unknown
    • Hulk70166
      As usual your "replies" don't make any sense. You are writing for the sake of appearing to have a reply. lol
    • Army Veteran
      "Everything he said he made up or was a bald-faced lie." - is that the hand you want to play in this deal? That must mean that everyone else made up what they said, also. Is it just your video sources, or...how is it you only hear what agrees with your views and continue to deny what doesn't? Remember what I keep saying about "denial"? Your credibility here is eroding as we speak.
  • Young children should be worried hes an evil preditor just like his younger brother. "Powerful men should not be allowed to commit sexual crimes and get away with it."
    • Army Veteran
      When I hear the word "evil" used in a political discussion, my thoughts automatically go back to George Bush, Jr. He used the word "evil" more than a baby uses the word "mama". With him, everyone opposed to the US was an "evildoer". I got so sick of listening to that and, when he used it on the world stage, I cringed the same way I did when Trump would start in with his less-than-cultured vocabulary. Or worse, whenever Biden even steps up to the podium.
    • 11stevo73
      You let evil get away with it your whole life you participated in doing evil for US govverment you did evil deads you are evil Sir. All the politicans you speak of are 2 heads of the same beast. They are all scum.
    • Hulk70166
      RE 1465 aka Army Veteran ", I cringed the same way I did when Trump would start in with his less-than-cultured vocabulary" Dude, are you sick? You just said something bad about a Republican. Are you feeling okay?
    • Army Veteran
      Congratulations, Hulk. For the first time in your life, you recognized someone who deals in facts and doesn't attach himself to a self-destructive Party on either side of the aisle. It's called "thinking for yourself". When you support the Party regardless of its ideology, you support its accomplishments and failings. That's what turns people into sheep. They let others do their thinking for them, resulting in perpetual denial. Too bad you fell into that hole.
  • Firstly, as King, Charles isn't allowed to have a political view. Secondly, we left the EU and aligned with the US and Israel, so it wouldn't make any sense, the only thing that IS going on is that there are deals in which the GP practices are being sold off to the US, as such emphasis is being placed on profit rather than service, which Boris denied would happen. .
    • Army Veteran
      Thanks for planting the seeds of doubt in my head with your "it wouldn't make any sense" logic. Britain doesn't have what one might call a "credible history" of leaving other countries alone. They were knee-deep in starting both world wars. There is, however, one fact that reassures me - in both of those wars, they started them but needed the United States to bail them out. LOL
    • Creamcrackered
      America also doesn't have a credible history of leaving other countries alone either AV, so what's your point? You say they were knee deep in starting both world wars, but I thought you said it was Zionists that did this, secondly, and as I've stated before Franklin Roosevelt and his administration wanted war and made every effort to instigate World War II in Europe, as demonstrated from a mass of documents from the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs when the Germans invaded Warsaw in late September 1939. These were published in The German White Paper, the most-revealing document in the collection is a secret report dated January 12, 1939 by Jerzy Potocki, the Polish ambassador to the United States, quote "There is a feeling now prevalent in the United States marked by growing hatred of Fascism, and above all of Chancellor Hitler and everything connected with National Socialism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews who control almost 100% [of the] radio, film, daily and periodical press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents Germany as black as possible–above all religious persecution and concentration camps are exploited–this propaganda is nevertheless extremely effective since the public here is completely ignorant and knows nothing of the situation in Europe. At the present moment most Americans regard Chancellor Hitler and National Socialism as the greatest evil and greatest peril threatening the world. The situation here provides an excellent platform for public speakers of all kinds, for emigrants from Germany and Czechoslovakia who with a great many words and with most various calumnies incite the public. They praise American liberty which they contrast with the totalitarian states. It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign which is conducted above all against National Socialism, Soviet Russia is almost completely eliminated. Soviet Russia, if mentioned at all, is mentioned in a friendly manner and things are presented in such a way that it would seem that the Soviet Union were cooperating with the bloc of democratic states. Thanks to the clever propaganda the sympathies of the American public are completely on the side of Red Spain. This propaganda, this war psychosis is being artificially created. The American people are told that peace in Europe is hanging only by a thread and that war is inevitable. At the same time the American people are unequivocally told that in case of a world war, America also must take an active part in order to defend the slogans of liberty and democracy in the world. President Roosevelt was the first one to express hatred against Fascism. In doing so he was serving a double purpose; first he wanted to divert the attention of the American people from difficult and intricate domestic problems, especially from the problem of the struggle between capital and labor. Second, by creating a war psychosis and by spreading rumors concerning dangers threatening Europe, he wanted to induce the American people to accept an enormous armament program which far exceeds United States defense requirements. Regarding the first point, it must be said that the internal situation on the labor market is growing worse constantly. The unemployed today already number 12 million. Federal and state expenditures are increasing daily. Only the huge sums, running into billions, which the treasury expends for emergency labor projects, are keeping a certain amount of peace in the country. Thus far only the usual strikes and local unrest have taken place. But how long this government aid can be kept up it is difficult to predict today. The excitement and indignation of public opinion, and the serious conflict between private enterprises and enormous trusts on the one hand, and with labor on the other, have made many enemies for Roosevelt and are causing him many sleepless nights.
    • Creamcrackered
      Continued...As to point two, I can only say that President Roosevelt, as a clever player of politics and a connoisseur of American mentality, speedily steered public attention away from the domestic situation in order to fasten it on foreign policy. The way to achieve this was simple. One needed, on the one hand, to enhance the war menace overhanging the world on account of Chancellor Hitler, and, on the other hand, to create a specter by talking about the attack of the totalitarian states on the United States. The Munich pact came to President Roosevelt as a godsend. He described it as the capitulation of France and England to bellicose German militarism. As was said here: Hitler compelled Chamberlain at pistol-point. Hence, France and England had no choice and had to conclude a shameful peace. The prevalent hatred against everything which is in any way connected with German National Socialism is further kindled by the brutal attitude against the Jews in Germany and by the émigré problem. In this action Jewish intellectuals participated; for instance, Bernard Baruch; the Governor of New York State, Lehman; the newly appointed judge of the Supreme Court, Felix Frankfurter; Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau, and others who are personal friends of Roosevelt. They want the President to become the champion of human rights, freedom of religion and speech, and the man who in the future will punish trouble-mongers. These groups, people who want to pose as representatives of “Americanism” and “defenders of democracy” in the last analysis, are connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry. For this Jewish international, which above all is concerned with the interests of its race, to put the President of the United States at this “ideal” post of champion of human rights, was a clever move. In this manner they created a dangerous hotbed for hatred and hostility in this hemisphere and divided the world into two hostile camps. The entire issue is worked out in a mysterious manner. Roosevelt has been forcing the foundation for vitalizing American foreign policy, and simultaneously has been procuring enormous stocks for the coming war, for which the Jews are striving consciously. With regard to domestic policy, it is extremely convenient to divert public attention from anti-Semitism which is ever growing in the United States, by talking about the necessity of defending faith and individual liberty against the onslaught of fascism. continued...
    • Creamcrackered
      continued..On January 16, 1939, Potocki reported to the Warsaw Foreign Ministry a conversation he had with American Ambassador to France William Bullitt. Bullitt was in Washington on a leave of absence from Paris. Potocki reported that Bullitt stated the main objectives of the Roosevelt administration were: 1. The vitalizing foreign policy, under the leadership of President Roosevelt, severely and unambiguously condemns totalitarian countries. 2. The United States preparation for war on sea, land and air which will be carried out at an accelerated speed and will consume the colossal sum of $1,250 million. 3. It is the decided opinion of the President that France and Britain must put [an] end to any sort of compromise with the totalitarian countries. They must not let themselves in for any discussions aiming at any kind of territorial changes. 4. They have the moral assurance that the United States will leave the policy of isolation and be prepared to intervene actively on the side of Britain and France in case of war. America is ready to place its whole wealth of money and raw materials at their disposal.” continued..
    • Creamcrackered
      Juliusz (Jules) ?ukasiewicz, the Polish ambassador to France, sent a top-secret report from Paris to the Polish Foreign Ministry at the beginning of February 1939. A week ago, the Ambassador of the United States, W. Bullitt, returned to Paris after having spent three months holiday in America. Meanwhile, I had two conversations with him which enable me to inform Monsieur Minister on his views regarding the European situation and to give a survey of Washington’s policy…. The international situation is regarded by official quarters as extremely serious and being in danger of armed conflict. Competent quarters are of the opinion that if war should break out between Britain and France on the one hand and Germany and Italy on the other, and Britain and France should be defeated, the Germans would become dangerous to the realistic interests of the United States on the American continent. For this reason, one can foresee right from the beginning the participation of the United States in the war on the side of France and Britain, naturally after some time had elapsed after the beginning of the war. Ambassador Bullitt expressed this as follows: “Should war break out we shall certainly not take part in it at the beginning, but we shall end it!" So they only planned to enter at the end IF france and Britain weren't winning, through there own fear of Italy and Germany, how brave, let the pawns go in first and do the dirty work. And you'll pop in at the end with all your weaponry and tanks. https://alethonews.com/2019/10/13/roosevelt-conspired-to-start-world-war-ii-in-europe/ll end it." Here is the rest of that article. This is the second time I've posted it, but I gather you are not interested in reading it because it doesn't fit your view point, and in that way you are guilty of the same denial in which you accuse others. You pick and choose, where as I am accepting of the way our leaders have deceived us and chosen to get themselves involved in wars, and other invasions for their own gain, whilst lying to the rest of us, I'm under no illusion. I know Winston Churchill wanted the alignment with Europe and not American in case we ended up going to war with the US.
    • Hulk70166
      CC: Congratulations. You just "out-wrote" me. lol

Copyright 2020, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy