ANSWERS: 2
  • Sure! Genocide is always the answer.
    • Creamcrackered
      Well, Darwin and the X-club as well as those elite today, held to the belief that war, disease and poverty would help control population growth. But of course that is no longer working so well as we cure illnesses and improve life for those in poverty.
    • Creamcrackered
      Here are the organisations you can join, so it is a very real issue. https://overpopulation-project.com/organizations-dealing-with-overpopulation/#:~:text=Rientrodolce%20%E2%80%93%20An%20Italian%20association%20which%20concerns%20itself,humanitarian%2C%20environmental%20and%20energy%20crises%20plaguing%20our%20planet. https://populationmatters.org/news/2020/01/chris-packham-we-need-talk-about-population My aim is if there is no objective morality, then it is perfectly logical to reduce the population if it's taking it's toll on the planet, and resources, even if it's a purge disguised as something else.
    • Linus van Pelt
      And along with that technology that prolongs life comes technology to improve food production and preservation. They can even make synthetic meat from plant material now. Plants and animals can be genetically modified to grow faster, larger and to produce more.
  • If it is as you say then a purge is also meaningless either way.
    • Creamcrackered
      Sorry can you explain?
    • Linus van Pelt
      Ecclesiastes 1:2 Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity.

Copyright 2020, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy