What do you think about this: Biden got elected with the intent of starting a war with Russia. He can't justify dragging his feet spending America into the toilet - he's not doing it fast enough. WW3 would be just the ticket to bankrupt the United States. Hillary would have done the same thing - that was one of the main talking points when she ran in 2016.

He - and most of the other European leaders - weeks ago essentially promised Russia that they would not go to war over Ukraine. All of these leaders have been and are threatening "sanctions" (and always and only sanctions). Sanctions have a history of being almost entirely ineffective at deterring oppressive and aggressive actions taken by a government, but a good record of making politicians LOOK like they're taking energetic action to put a stop to such behavior (when in fact they are not acting to stop it, and know full well that they are not). The very fact that all of these leaders promised sanctions - rather than some military response - if Russia invades Ukraine is a clear (and probably intentional) indication to Russia that Ukraine will NOT receive combat support from other nations if Russia invades. That is: Ukraine was "hung out to dry" by the West several weeks ago. *** Of course war has an economic impact - and typically a bad one - although often NOT for a nation that is involved in the war in a way other than as a target of conquest. For NON-INVOLVED nations and target nations: stock prices fall, inflation takes hold, etc. On the other hand: for non-target nations (involved in the war but not on their own soil), though inflation increases at first, it returns to low levels within a couple of years while employment rates increase as 1) troops are sent into battle, including reserves 2) corporations need to hire people to replace the now-active reserves. Meanwhile, the government is spending tons of money to purchase all the materiel needed to support troops in the field, including not only military vehicles, weapons and ammo, but also clothing, food, etc. I.e. significantly increasing the average per capita income. *** Many nations in recent history (last 150 years) have USED war (have been aggressors) intentionally to bolster a faltering economy...and in cases in which such war has been successful, the overall economic condition of such nations certainly improved significantly. Long drawn-out wars (a decade or more long) tend to severely harm the economy of even a successful aggressor nation.

Biden is the reason fuel prices are the way they are. It was disclosed North Dakota was ordered to leave 500,000 barrels of oil in the ground. Biden's pushing an agenda regardless of what it does to your family.

Canceling the XL pipeline and dropping the sanctions on the Russian Nord Stream pipeline was a great move by Joe, don't you think? Thanks Joe!

I mentioned in another post that I knew Russia wouldn't start anything. Everyone got nervous because Putin was bringing their military close to the Ukraine border, making it appear as if an attack was imminent - or so the globalist media tried to make the world think. As it turned out, it was nothing more than a Russin military exercise. Russia borders Ukraine, so moving its troops close to the border is not so uncommon. When I was stationed in Berlin in 1973 (the Berlin Wall was still standing), we had a training area right next to the wall where we would do practice maneuvers. Whenever we aimed our mortars over the wall, you could see the East German guards in the towers aim their weapons at us - weapons that were loaded with live ammo. We never intended to "start another war" with anyone. And neither did Russia. Thanks to the Hillary Clinton Russia, Russia, Russia hoax meant to take out President Trump, the security of much of the free world has been weakened and world leaders are jumping at shadows. Hillary needs to be put away for the rest of her life.