ANSWERS: 8
  • I think he had a bad defense lawyer. He was offered parole if he would complete a sex offender treatment program. The fact that he refused strongly suggests that he is in fact, innocent. I believe he was falsely accused just as Brett Kavanaugh was when he was being confirmed for Supreme Court Justice. In this twisted day and age, a person is guilty by accusation, and when it comes to sexual offenses, the courts are more likely to believe the victim, especially one who is female.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thank you for the comment well appreciated :)
    • Beat Covid, Avoid Republicans
      .
    • Linda Joy
      or a child.
  • they said he never got a fair trial.....
    • Army Veteran
      For him to have taken the deal they offered, he would be admitting his guilt. No matter what proof of his innocence may be found after that, the record will always show that he was guilty.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for sharing your comment :)
  • 50 Victims are not wrong!. Somebody got paid off. This stuff doesn't happen in the USA, but since the 'suicide' of Jeffrey Epstein we are in the Age of Trump and anything goes. 😇😆😍😎
    • Army Veteran
      If 50 victims offered no proof, they're ALL wrong. And since he wasn't convicted for 50 counts, it's only logical that they didn't have substantial proof. Guilt by accusation is unconstitutional.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for sharing your comment :)
    • Beat Covid, Avoid Republicans
      @1465 So you are saying Cosby was innocent? You don't think he drugged any of those women?
    • Beat Covid, Avoid Republicans
      @ 1465 - Now you are being ridiculous. You just want attention. lol
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for sharing your comment :)
    • Army Veteran
      I wasn't there, so I can't say he didn't any more than you can say he did. You're making a judgment based on what he is accused of.
    • Beat Covid, Avoid Republicans
      @1465 - The reason two women came forward rather than 50 is because in most of the cases the statute of limitations lapsed.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thank you for the comment well appreciated :)
  • He's already been prosecuted in the press. No one is likely to hire him. He doesn't have long left on this earth and he will never have the fame and fortune he once knew. And to add insult statistics say without medication he has less than a 15% chance he can even get it up now at 80 something. He can't take that 400 million to the grave with him. What does he really have left? Old age and misery?
    • Army Veteran
      So, the ends justify the means?
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for sharing your comment :)
    • Linda Joy
      1465, don't put words in my mouth. I don't play that game. If you want to say I said something put it in quotation marks and copy it in the way I said it. If you want to jump to a conclusion based on facts I presented that happened in YOUR HEAD it did NOT come OUT MY MOUTH! If you're gonna quote me, do it right! Otherwise it makes you a liar because that's not what I said. I was asked for my thoughts and I responded honestly. I'm sad for the man. I'm sad for any woman who is molested or raped and those who testify falsely are injuring the women who have really had to endure such a thing all over again. I'm sure if all you want to do is argue a point you can twist my words to offend you if you try hard enough. I've been molested since the age of 2 or 3. I've been molested by several men. I have learned how to forgive them. Not for them, but so they can't hurt me in my present. So if you've found fault with something I said please identify exactly what it is I said that you sought out to find fault.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thank you for the comment well appreciated :)
  • He is still guilty.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for sharing your comment :)
  • He can afford the best lawyers. Those lawyers found a "loophole", so to speak. If you or I or "the average joe on the street" were tried for the same thing, that "loophole" would never have been discovered because we would never be able to afford a sufficiently large and expert legal team. "Justice for money, that's what they say. We all know it's the American way."
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for sharing your comment :)
    • Army Veteran
      It wasn't a "loophole" - it was a violation of due process. The prosecutor's office lied to him to get him to testify in another case and then used his testimony against him.
    • www.bible-reviews.com
      "Dismissal due to violation of due process" is EXACTLY what is meant by "loophole". A "loophole" in the criminal trial system is any violation of legal procedural regulation that allows a defendant to escape prosecution IRREGARDLESS of the defendant's innocence or guilt.
  • Money and a good lawyer can get you out of anything even if guilty!
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thanks for sharing your comment :)
  • What a screw-up. Women should be up in arms about it.
    • DancesWithWolves
      Thank you for the comment well appreciated :)

Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy