ANSWERS: 13
-
Yes, they were.
-
I don't agree with their decision.
-
Absolutely not. And every one of those judges that voted for it should, and probably (hopefully) will rot in hell for it.
-
The Court did not "allow" gay marriage. What they did -- correctly, in my view -- is strike down a voter initiative that purported to limit the right to marry to heterosexual couples. California's Constitution (unlike many other states) expressly forbids discrimination based upon sexual orientation, and the law in question clearly violated that provision of the California Constitution.
-
Meh, I'm cool with it. Who cares? Let them get married.
-
yes, why not it is legal in Canada
-
No. They overstepped their bounds. Putting aside ones opinion on the matter; if it is not expressly addressed in the constitution , state or federal, the decision is left to the vote of the people. For activist judges to over rule the decision of the people is a very bad thing. It is happening far too much and is a major problem. Activist judges need to be removed from the bench.
-
Who should be right in California, if not the Supreme Court? I personally agree with this decision. I am also happy for the sympathic comedian Ellen DeGeneres who just got engaged after this decision. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_DeGeneres
-
I agree with their decision.
-
Yes, certainly, I don't think it's the place of a government to prevent people from doing things that don't harm others.
-
Yes, end discrimination now!
-
Yes, gay marriage is the same as straight marriage.
-
The Government has no place trying to govern morality when absolutely nobody is hurt, so yes.
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC