ANSWERS: 14
-
I can't choose one over the other because I'm sandwiched between the two.
-
Facts. Without question.
-
I think they can be the same thing. I can't have faith in something that I don't have a high probability will happen. If you always drive me to work every Monday, and have for 20 years, you bet I have faith that you will show up next Monday. That is what faith is to me. Blind faith is silly and meaningless.
-
Faith. You can continue saying you are right even though every one around you knows you're wrong. And eventually, they get sick of arguing with you, so you can pretend you won the argument through stubbornness.
-
I like facts, hard and true, faith is too blind for me.
-
Science will tell you that facts are all that matters. But faith is what holds me up and keeps me standing when everyone else around me tells me I'm wrong.
-
Given that Faith is definitionally blind, I would have to go with facts, even though facts alone tend to be somewhat useless...
-
On the prayer study they conducted, people prayed for actually had MORE complications. It appears they were more stressed to deliver results. So prayer CAN be hurtful. What better to know what you're doing and not rely on mumbo jumbo and witch dances.
-
id rather have faith, facts can change
-
Both make people do stupid things. But I choose facts, because with these it's easier to know why we do the things we do.
-
Facts. Faith is just justified idiocy.
-
You mean more fun? ;-)
-
I think we need both. Faith in things that are harmful is a bad thing, but believing in "facts" which change as we learn more is equally as bad.
-
xxxx
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC