ANSWERS: 56
-
I think a couple small ones are attractive, but if their whole body has tattoos on it then it is not attractive.
-
Depends on the tattoo. But many people see tattoos on a female as a sign of promiscuity, which some will think is good some will think is bad. Just keep that in mind.
-
A few, small, tasteful ones are ok. These nasty neck tattoos and chest tattoos(that aren't covered by clothing) are getting more and more popular here in PA, and I think these girls look foul. And I'd think that these "Whore's Mark" tailbone tattoos would have gone out of style when everyone started getting them, but apparently not. Whatever. It's their skin, I guess, but I'm not impressed.
-
Emmm..err..hmmm, depends on the size, the place and more importanly, the female.
-
It's personal preference, but I think there's nothing more beautiful than natural, ink-free, bare skin. If you want to paint it up with team colours to cheer at the hockey game, or wear a little whipped cream for other "unspecified" activities, that's fine by me... then there's opportunities for fun in the shower or the bedroom later. ;-)
-
They can be very attractive. I have 5 and love the way they look. My tat's ar all kinda girlie, no skulls or deamons. Tattood flowers, birds, butterflys, and the such are very nice on ladies! I dont like to see ladies with big chest tat's or full arms, but that is a personal choice.
-
i think so..thats why I'm covered in them.
-
I think tattoos on girls are HOT! They have to be tastefully done however.
-
I think that a beautiful woman is going to be attractive either way, tattoos or not. For Example, Kat Von D in my opinion, is a beautiful woman, BUT, she would look better if she had not tattooed her face and hands, but, she is still beautiful nonetheless.I prefer no tattoos on a woman, but, since I have one , it would be hypocritical for me to hold that against ANYONE else.
-
It depends upon where and how many and what they are. List of OK in K's book: A discreet one on the ankle, above the crack of the rump (i.e butterfly), something on the shoulder and something not too extravagant below the navel such as tall grass, use scythe if you want to with visual image.
-
I think tattoos on women are horrible!!
-
I love them only if its just one or two at the most and of medium size.
-
Hmmm...Barcodes are quite interesting.
-
i think it depends a lot on who wears the tattoo. not only with females by the way.
-
i think they a beautiful thats why im covered
-
Yes, I think that they are very hot. My wife has several and I think she is the sexiest woman on the planet! http://www.tattootips.org/Black%20Light%20Ink.html
-
I have a small tat on the back of my neck that is only visible when my hair is pulled up. I have got nothing but good reactions about it. I agree that huge pieces like full back or sleeves can be trashy depending on the person but for the most part small classy tats are very attractive.
-
Very attractive when tasteful
-
Attractive tattoos on attractive females is attractive.
-
I think you should get your entire face done up black.
-
call me bland but I find tatoos almost always ugly and on the rare occasion it is not ugly to me, I am indifferent about it. this is on both males and females. when it comes to actual attractive.... conservative perminent makeup can be pretty, but that is the extent of my ink tastes. I seriously love the natural beauty of flesh
-
I don't care about the outside... It's the inside that counts... :D But, if I had to give an answer; it all depends on the person, the image, and how they themselves feel about it...
-
I don't really care for them but that is just me.
-
Depends on the woman & the tatoo.
-
I'm not Into tattoo's on myself, but It's Ok on females If their done right and not In a trashy way =)
-
NOT
-
I like a female who has a small tasteful tattoo on an intimate part of her body that only I can see.
-
If you're looking at a lady straight at her tattoo rather than her eyes, you aren't attracted to her anyway, but who's to judge? It's an individual thing, the good lord knows I have enough tattoos, but when you have a home, you decorate, right? In summary, yes..attractive.
-
+6 NOT. But that is just me. So I throw my 2 cents in and want everyone to know thats just me. For the rest of you.... Go to town!!!!:-D
-
I like them on females, I have one myself,
-
It can add character and be very erotic if it's done tastefully. I dislike multi-colored tattoos. Most come out looking cheap. Black tribal designs are more elegant.
-
on my wife not on my f**k toy hot
-
Not trying to stir a feminist rant, but just as some seek a "sense of humor"...(haaaa what a load). Not for me, but I wouldn't reject someone I liked if they had one.
-
Hot. Bif Naked is as hot as they come.
-
they tend to be trashy more often than not. great for trailer park girls though.
-
Definitly NOT attractive
-
not attractive. . .actually it's a turn off to me.
-
As long as they havent got a sleeve..That's really guy-like. It can be beautiful, but I wouldn't do it. And you do not have to be trailertrash to have a tattoo. Rather the reason you got it makes you trash or not.
-
I think they can me if done in certain ways and in other ways, not. Often I think it makes a woman more intriguing but as long as it's not overdone and is tasteful.
-
only if they have a very good look that obviously almost always includes tattoos. i think that is extrememly attractive! (Y) if it's some stupid butterfly on their back or ankle - anything retarded like that they got when they ran away for a day when they were 16, NO.
-
I love tattoos on a girls lower back.
-
"In the eye of the beholder", huh? ;-)
-
I don't think so, but my g/f is going to be getting one with my name on it.
-
i think they are attractive.
-
not
-
Not to me. The female can be attractive but not the tattoos on her.
-
I think it can be VERY hot, but it really depends on the girl, the tattoo, the placement, everything. I know of a girl in my town that has a tramp stamp of DANCING MEAT PRODUCTS and I think it's the stupidest thing in the world. NOT HOT. But like...Danger from For The Love of Ray J has a tiger tattooed on her FACE and I think that she is hot like fire! It all depends.
-
Initially if they are well done, perhaps; fifty years down the road, not so much.
-
hell yes,but it depends because, if u have ur two arms selves full of Tat. i don't find that attractive at all, it depends on what you have.
-
In my opinion it depends on the quality of the ink. Most women get stupid tattoos... that aside they also get horrible quality tattoos from butchers who POSE as tattoo artists, usually at *shudder* tattoo parties. I feel that a woman completely covered in well done ink (even if they are "stupid' to me... may be meaningful to them) looks far better than a few scattered tattoos. Those random, scattered tattoos are FAR MORE TRASHY in to me.
-
No.
-
totally yes. unless the tattoos are ugly or badly done.
-
As long as it's "tasteful", I think so! =) Here's a picture of mine:
-
Some can be, others, not so much.
-
For me? Not. I find them tacky and vulgar.
-
Depends on the tattoo and the woman. Some tattoos can look fantastic and even really sexy, but poorly done ones, or just tacky choices like roses or bulldogs look terrible.
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC