Anyone who supports abortion would hide behind a child in a life-or-death situation because they value their own interests above those of a child. I hope you don't have any kids.

They always have whether it was legal or not. I just don't think murder should be legal. Especially when there are so many other options these days.

This recent court decision is just a temporary reprieve in what was a stupid and draconian decision. Every news report I heared to today said the Scotus is going to wipe out abortion this year. I hope you orange-heads are up for the crime wave of unwanted kids becoming crime statistics. lol😈

The reason more women don't give their kids up for adoption is because they are biologically hard-wired to care for their kids. Men know this and take advantage of it. 😓 This is why so many women chose a life of poverty or marrying a bad man over giving the baby over to adoption.

From reading the full article that is not really the concern, the concern is this is not being driven by "government enforcement," but by "civil enforcement" through civil lawsuits. Anyone can sue, regardless of whether some harm was done to them. Legal experts have said the law is a “radical expansion” of standing, which is the legal concept that determines whether one person may sue another, usually in order to get compensation for some sort of injury or harm. The new abortion law requires no such relationship to the case in order to have standing. It’s a very unusual measure in tort law, which is usually used to provide remedies to people who have incurred a harm. Adriana Piñon, a senior staff attorney and policy counsel for the ACLU of Texas, said the law “leaves open the courtroom door in Texas.” Legal experts have said that the concept to expand standing is part of an emerging trend in Republican-dominated state governments that find it difficult to constitutionally prohibit actions they dislike. Instead, such governments empower civilians to sue for civil remedies. Anti-abortion groups argue that the Texas Legislature can legitimately give anyone standing. State courts are likely to sort out whether the Texas Constitution requires someone to have sustained an injury in order to bring a lawsuit, or if, indeed, the Legislature’s permission is enough to allow people to sue for what lawyers call “generalized grievances,” or harms that weren’t committed against them personally. From my perspective this can only result in anarchy, with a torrent of lawsuits. Someone's going to be making money.

Such as the decision on whether to take the vaccine, or not? You people are too dense to see your own hypocrisy.

It has been temporarily reversed. What a shame!