Does anyone think this question about evidence for a creator god should be labeled as nonsense?
by 
23Skidoo
ANSWERS: 17
-
I do not. It's a perfectly valid question. But since someone obviously got their panties into a bunch over it, they decided that you didn't have the right to ask a perfectly valid question. After all, they couldn't answer it without making themselves look like the fool.
-
Well, we could answer it here. I would but my brain went to sleep an hour and a half ago, and god nonsense does my head in. I have faith there is no evidence.
-
Not nonsense. But I would label it spam. Cause it's such a boring question, repeated over and over again, and stinking of heavy anti-theistic provocation, that everytime I see this question asked AGAIN, I feel like making this gesture: http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/8/8e/Picard_Facepalm.jpg
-
It's not complete nonsense because the question makes sense even though it's impossible to answer, but it seems like spam because it's a provocative and frustrating trick question to believers, that's all.
-
Use feedback and demand it be reinstated. It is possible that it could be merged with another similar question, but it is not spam.
-
+4 A perfectly valid question and a very important one, as evidenced by the fact that it got 65 answers and a huge number of comments. In fact I can't think of many questions on AB that are more important than this one. . Definitely should not have been rejected.
-
Good one. Use the feedback link at the bottom of that page and request it be reinstated. Use a logical argument to present your case. Not every request for reinstatement will go through, necessarily, but I've found in my experience that if it's a fairly clear cut case (like this one seems to be), and you present your reasoning logically, the odds are it will be reinstated. :):)
-
No, I don't think that it should have been. There was some good discussions in it. If there was an offensive answer, maybe the particular answer should have been flagged, but I did not see anything offensive in the question.
-
This is NOT RIGHT! Why would someone do that?! I was having a debate with two on there and now they wont allow a rebuttal! I am allowed to rebuttal. And for whoever did this (and I think I know who it was, one of TWO people) don't think you won by labeling it nonsense and not allowing a rebuttal. And if it wasn't the ones who I think it was, in fact whoever it was, you should let discussions like that go on. That is very cowardly to resort to labeling things NONSENSE.
-
Good news! It's no longer labeled as nonsense :) +5
-
sixty five people thought it was not nonsense. one person complained and it got kicked out. that is an example of nonsense. we are the evidence...but no one wants to believe it.
-
From "my" observation, I can think of two reasons right off hand. The first reason is that outside of the Bible, there really isn't any evidence of God's existence and you know that which brings me to the second reason why your question is nonsense, it's redundant. How many times does this question have to be asked especially when you don't believe in a Creator and because you already know that there is no physical evidence for God's existence. Christians in AB have readily admitted that. Our belief in God is based on faith no whether God can be tested in a laboratory. Yet unbelievers feel it necessary to continue to ask the same question repeatedly. Because of my above reasons,I find your question and questions like it, nonsensical, obtuse, boring, and old. Just my opinion of course.
-
It is nonsense.
-
NOPE especially since I was last to write something....hahhahah . Hey skiddo good question and good question. hope to continue the debate... sad that someone had to flag this one and a couple others we were talking on. +3
-
What the hell? This stuff makes me mad! I hate how this site censores stuff as soon as some loons are 'offended' or whatever. This site turns into North Korea, seriously..
-
I don't.
-
Here we go again - tagged a second time as nonsense...
Moongrim RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC