ANSWERS: 32
  • Mature men should be able to handle their emotions without women having to cover their skin.
  • I've been to pools and the beach before. True, in some cases it's more ... titillating ... than flat out nudity, in some cases, but it's just eye candy. HELL NO! It should NOT be covered! LOL ;-)
  • G'day Moat, Thank you for your question. Not really. I don't think that there is any more showing than there used to be. Besides, I can control myself reasonably well and only drool a little bit. Regards
  • Personally, I've never met a man with that opinion, but have heard rumors that some of their girlfriends would like all other females to wear raincoats...
  • i think women shouldn't get mad if a man looks at her breats when she wears a very tight low cut shirt. like seriously why do you wear a shirt like that if you dont want men to look?
  • yes they should cover more skin . the more girls show thier skin the sluttier they become .
  • Why don't you get your mind right and not worry about what girls are wearing. You don't control women. You control you.
  • No, but I think some sort of social standard should be set to maybe dissuade overly irresponsible behavior that most eventually end up regretting.
  • Well, it depends. Who likes to watch fatty or ugly girls during summer? ;) I can control myself. I find that I'm more attracted to women who dress modestly than to those who uncover a lot.
  • I'll cover my thighs if men cover their chests. Otherwise, the hell with it. And I hope that men don't consent to this, because I like men chest.
  • I'm not a man, but dictating the amount of skin allowed to show on a woman, and man for that matter, is left up to the law of the land. Lets leave it that way shall we.
  • No, I cant say it bothers me!
  • I'm going to say no. It's not offensive at all that girls are allowed to show their skin. But you gotta admit that there are some girls who KNOW they shouldn't be showing off that much skin.
  • Nope. I think it's wonderful. Of course they shouldn't be surprised or offended when people look at them. +5
  • I don't find is distracting at all, at least not in and of itself. I am more distracted by the way they move. If a nudist walks by like it's the most casual thing in the world, I barely give them a second glance. On the other hand, even someone wearing baggy jeans and long sleeves can be distracting if they wag around and carry themselves a certain way. It isn't the clothes; it's the way they are worn.
  • its not distracting but is attracting to see the exposed skin seriously such over exposed skin distracts men from whatever they are doing so men should become more "moral" type so that skin doesn't distract them instead of changing girls, why can't we (men) change our-selves first.... ... GOLDEN RULE : IF MEN DON"T FIND GIRL"S SKIN ATTRACTIVE< WHY WOULD GIRLS SHOW IT OFF.... simple ... so start not to get attracted by girl's skin, they'll stop showing it off.... and even if due to hot-humid conditions they wer less clothes.... let them, as of now you are not the least concerned about the exposed skin .... no offences to males , females ... just my thoughts
  • No I don't find it distracting, then again I tend to be a bit dense in that regard. Me thinks my wires got crossed somehow or another as I'm more apt to take note of an attractive lady in a suit than I am of someone who is dressed much skimpier. Yeah, I know I'm strange, glad to say I've never been accused of being normal ;).
  • Yes, pleasantly distracting, and no, should not be covered (for fuck's sake, no)
  • I`ll show you mine if you show me yours !!!!!
  • It's great, keep it up - yes it's distracting, but providing a the girls are happy to show skin - carry on - we live in the free world not some boring Saudi Arabian style country!
  • Yes it should be covered up. The amount of times I have nearly crashed my car. By sticking my head out of the window & shouting `Yowsa!` or `Woof Woof` & `Look at the mangos on that mamma`.
  • Yes it's distracting, no it shouldn't be covered up.
  • Outside of school and work...Notat'all. If you got it flaunt it...if you don't cover it up. ;)
  • Thank goodness that we live in a country where you can dress how you want. jeez! Are you proposing there should be some kind of law to MAKE us dress how YOU want?! How bloody presumptuous. I am a girl and I rarely wear anything particularly skimpy, but I still find that really offensive. Whenever I see a woman in a burkha walking down the street on a hot day while her husband/goddamn chaperone walks beside her in shorts and flip flops it makes me very angry.
  • I know this doesn't apply to me since I am a woman... but I want to give my POV. If any men out there find it distracting, and if any of these men consequently think it should be covered it is THEIR problem. Why should women have to dress how men like so as not to distract them? Perhaps the men who have problems should change their attitude and work on themselves and their own weaknesses rather than wanting or expecting women to adapt their behaviour and clothing choices to accomodate them? Really cheeses me off.
  • I don't mind at all. It's nice to see the skin of nice women and girls. I'm not blushing red if I see some skin.
  • Theres nothing i love more than beautiful women but i feel they should have more pride than that
  • As a man, I am able to control my dick. Sure, I might appreciate the female form but I'm a decent enough person to know that it is my responsibility to not go raping and pillaging.
  • If it's the girl's own style, then great for her. Although if she's just a slut and is trying to impress other girls, then that's NOT attractive... ;D
  • It can be distracting but nice too look at too. As long as the girl is not a prick teaser or just looking for attention. I Suppose its better than the middle east where the women are completly covered.
  • Sometimes distracting but no, it shouldn't be covered. We have minimum standards for clothing on women that say they can't show their sex organs (same for men) or nipples (not the same for men). The game has always been to show something attention-getting. This is usually done by revealing some new part of the body for men to obsess over, hence backless dresses, open-toed shoes, fuck me pumps, mini-skirts, tube-tops, crop-tops, low-rise jeans and no doubt many other pieces of clothing I haven't thought of yet. . There is a subtext to dressing sexy. It is a kind of challenge to men to behave in spite of increased temptation. Whether one thinks of a particular article of clothing as flirty or sexy or slutty is of course up to the individual. . On the other side of the equation is the burkha. My understanding is that the cultures that enforce it believe that a man usually can't (and by extension shouldn't be expected to) control himself around women who look sexy. That's worse. Much worse.
  • well its like they wear a low cut shirt to show off their breasts, and then get appalled when men look?

Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy